检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沙金[1] SHA Jin(School of Public Administration, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134 China)
出 处:《河北法学》2017年第8期50-58,共9页Hebei Law Science
基 金:天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目<新〈行政诉讼法〉实施背景下的行政复议制度变更研究>(TJFX16-010);天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目<城市社区冲突参与式治理途径研究>(TJZZ15-005)
摘 要:"双被告"制度实施以来,复议机关和人民法院均面临着前所未有的诉讼压力,由此也带来了制度实施过程中的诸多新问题,这些问题的出现为《行政复议法》的修改提出了新的挑战。尽管"双被告"制度缺乏足够的法理支撑,但国家立法层面基于现实的考量推出的这一制度,为我国行政复议与行政诉讼制度的有效衔接拉开了序幕,为我国行政救济体系的建立奠定了基础。拟在论述"双被告"制度的理论基础和立法初衷的基础上,对复议维持决定的界定、司法审查的对象及举证责任、法院的裁判方式等方面加以分析,以期对相关制度的适用和完善提供借鉴。Since the "double" the defendant system, the administrative body for reconsideration and the people's court are facing unprecedented pressure of litigation, which has brought many new problems in the process of system implementation, especially in the administrative reconsideration law challenges brought about by the changes. Although "double" the defendant system is lack of legal support, but the national legislative level of this system was introduced based on practical considerations, for the effective connection of administrative review and administrative litigation system in China began, laid the foundation to establish the system of administrative remedies. To this end, the paper discusses the theoretical basis of "double" the defendant system and legislative intent, on the basis of the system involved in the process of judicial review of specific issues, such as definition, judicial review of maintaining the decision object and the burden of proof, the court judge way of analysis, in order to provide reference on the application of the relevant system and perfect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117