检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院,210029 [2]南京市建邺医院,210019
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2017年第9期1611-1613,共3页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
基 金:江苏省第十二批“六大人才高峰”项目(WSW-024)
摘 要:目的观察同步放化疗联合重组人血管内皮抑素(恩度)治疗腹膜后淋巴结转移癌(RLN)的疗效及安全性,探讨恩度在RLN治疗中的作用。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年6月41例腹膜后转移淋巴癌患者的临床资料,依据病史分为恩度联合组(12例)和同步放化疗组(29例)。恩度联合组:替吉奥1000mg/m^2,口服,2次/d,d1-d14;恩度15mg,静脉滴注,d1-d14,3周为1个周期。放疗采用IMRT方法。同步放化疗组放化疗方案同上。分析所有患者临床资料及随访结果,分别评价疗效、生活质量、疼痛评分及不良反应,并用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,Log-Rank检验进行两组比较。结果恩度联合组12例患者,有效率(RR)36.0%,疾病控制率(DCR)84.0%;中位无进展生存时间(PFS)11-2个月,中位总生存时间(OS)19.6个月;生活质量(QOL)改善稳定率75.0%,恩度联合治疗组治疗前后疼痛评分明显降低(P〈0.05);放化疗组29例患者,RR13.1%,DCR63.1%;中位PFS12.3个月,中位0S15.6个月;QOL改善及稳定率62.1%。两组RR比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组DCR、QOL改善稳定率、中位PFS和中住OS比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05),联合放化疗组治疗前后疼痛评分明显变化(P〉0.05)。两组患者不良反应差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论放化疗联合恩度治疗腹膜后转移癌优于放化疗组,提高患者生活质量,未增加副作用,恩度对腹膜后淋巴结转移癌的治疗有较好的放疗增敏作用。Objective To study the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy ( CRT ) combined with recombinant human endostatin ( rh- Endo ) in the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis ( RLN ) . Methods From Jan 2012 to June 2012, 41 patients with RLN from digestive cancer were retrospectively analyzed, according to clinical data, patients were randomly assigned to rh-Endo+ chemoradiotherapy ( CRT ) group ( 12 cases ) and CRT group ( 29 cases ) .For rh-Endo+ CRT group: S1 : 1000 mg/m^2, oral, bid, d1- d14. rh-Endo 15 mg, intravenous drip, d1- d14, 3 weeks for a cycle.The same scheme for CRT group. The clinical data and follow-up results for all patients were analyzed. Curative effect, quality of life ( QOL ) , pain relief score adverse reactions were respectively evaluated, drawing survival curve with Kaplan Meier ( Log-Rank test compared two groups ) . Results In rh-Endo+ CRT group, the response rate ( RR ) was 36.0%, disease control rate ( DCR ) was 84.0%.Median progression-free survival ( PFS ) was 11.2 months and median overall survival ( OS ) was 19.6 months.The quality of life ( QOL ) improved and stable rate was 75.0%.Pain relief score decreased significantly between pre-treatment and post-treatment ( P〈0.05 ) . In CRT group, the response rate ( RR ) was 13.1%, disease control rate ( DCR ) was 63.1%.Median progression-free survival ( PFS ) was 12.3 months and median overall survival ( OS ) was 15.6 months.QOL improved and stable rate was 62.1%.There was statistical difference both in RR between the two groups (P〈0.05) .DCR, QOL, median PFS and median OS were similar between the two groups ( P〉0.05 ) . Pain relief score were similar between pre-treatment and post-treatment in CRT group ( P〉0.05 ) . There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups ( P〉0.05 ) . Conclusions Curative effect of rh-Endo combined with CRT is obviously superior to that of CRT in the treatment o
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249