自由心证原则的再认识:制约与保障——以民事诉讼的事实认定为中心  

Reconsideration of the Principle of Discretionary Evaluation: Restriction and Guarantee——Centering on Fact-finding of Civil Procedure

作　　者：张卫平[1] Zhang Wei-ping(Law School of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《政法论丛》2017年第4期14-21,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：在我国,对于自由心证原则,人们不仅在基本涵义方面还存在一些误识,而且对于自由心证原则的应用,特别是如何制约与保障方面缺乏系统和深入的认识。更缺失针对民事诉讼语境下的具体认识。针对民事诉讼的具体情形进行比较深入地探讨自由心证原则运用的若干问题,重点是这一原则的制约和制度保障,有助于深化民事诉讼法对自由心证原则的制度建构和实践运用。In our country, there exists some misunderstanding of basic connotation of the principle of discretionary evaluation and there lacks systematic and deep recognition of its application, especially how to restrict and guarantee this principle. Furthermore, concrete cognition of civil procedure＇ s context is particularly lacked. Thus, this article discusses deeply some questions about the application of the principle of discretionary evaluation in some conditions of civil procedure and focuses on this principle＇ s restriction and guarantee, which helps civil procedural law to deepen institutional construction and practical application of the principle of discretionary evaluation.

关 键 词：事实认定 自由心证原则 法定证据原则 证据规定 经验法则 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]