中国古代罪刑法定之辨——从“断罪引律令”展开  

The Analysis of the Principle of Legally Prescribed Punishment in Ancient China

作　　者：王熠珏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2017年第4期52-58,71,共8页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：学界对中国古代是否存在罪刑法定的研究,大多陷入"西方有,中国也有"命题预设,或是受制于"现代化叙事"的桎梏,缺乏一种珍视传统却不抱守残缺的研究。反思以往的研究进路,以"断罪引律令"作为切入点:当断罪有正条时,依法裁判虽是中国古代司法的客观情形,但与如今罪刑法定要求的通过依法裁判来限制司法权有一定差距;当断罪无正条时,比附与类推由于在概念内涵、设置原因和具体类型上有所不同,故二者不能被简单等同。The academic research for the existence of legally prescribed punishment in ancient Chinese is lack of the attitude about the treasure of the tradition and facing the incompleteness squarely with the proposition that the punishment was found both in western countries and in China or with the fetters which was constrained by modern narration. With the reflection of former research and the pointcut of conviction according to the law, justice was objective for ancient Chinese judicature when the contemporary law supported the adjudication ,but was different with the present adjudicature. The adjudication in the ancient China and that in nowadays are not the same because of different concepts, causes and types of analogies when law can not support the adjudication.

关 键 词：中国古代司法 罪刑法定 断罪引律令 比附援引 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]