对话还是规训——弗洛伊德思想的现代性解读  

Dialogue or Discipline——Modernity Interpretation of Freud's Thought

作　　者：汤剑波[1] TANG Jian -bo(School of Politics and Sociology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学政治与社会学院,浙江杭州311121

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期57-62,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：弗洛伊德的精神分析理论混杂着现代性与后现代性:一方面在潜意识中肯定了非理性的价值,另一方面却依旧用精确的科学理性去探测潜意识;一方面肯定性的地位与反抗性压抑,另一方面却依旧沿用着基础主义的话语;一方面批评文明对个体的压抑,另一方面却依旧通过精神分析消解着反抗的力量。Freud＇s psychoanalytic theory is the mixture of modernity and postmodernity. On the one hand,Freud affirmed the value of irrationality in subconsciousness. On the other hand,he precisely detected subconsciousness through the method of scientific rationality. On the one hand,he affirmed the status of sex and resisted sexual repression. On the other hand,he followed the basic principles of fundamentalism. On the one hand,he criticized the suppression of civilization on the individual. On the other hand,he dispelled the forces of resistance through psychoanalytic approach.

关 键 词：弗洛伊德 理性 非理性 性 文明 

分 类 号：B521[哲学宗教—外国哲学]