阿维森纳《医典》脉法与中国传统脉法的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of "Canon of Medicine" Avicenna "Pulse" and "Chinese Medicine Pulse"

作　　者：管义红[1] 周瑞明[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北医药学院附属太和医院,湖北十堰442000

出　　处：《中医药导报》2017年第15期8-11,共4页Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：为了明确《医典》脉诊与中医脉诊的异同,通过对相关文献跟踪,对《医典》脉诊与中医脉诊的定义、取脉部位、脉诊技巧、脉象特征、特殊脉象、影响因素进行对比研究发现,《医典》脉诊的内容与中医脉诊没有直接的关系,而与现代医学系统研究紧密相关,这一发现对临床脉诊的研究有一定的指导意义。In order to clarify the similarities and differences between ＂Canon of Medicine＂ Pulse Diagnosis and ＂Traditional Chinese Medicine pulse diagnosis＂, in this paper, the tracking of the related literature, the definition of ＂Canon of Medicine＂ Pulse Diagnosis and ＂Traditional Chinese Medicine Pulse Diagnosis＂ ＂take the pulse location＂ ＂pulse diagnosis skills＂ ＂pulse＂ and ＂special pulse and influence factors of comparative study found that there was no direct relationship between ＂Canon of Medicine Pulse Diagnosis＂ and ＂Traditional Chinese Medicine Pulse Diagnosis＂, and that the modern medical system is closely related to the study; The found of clinical pulse diagnosis research has certain guiding significance.

关 键 词：《医典》 脉诊 比较研究 中医脉法 

分 类 号：R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]