检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐震[1] 宋立刚[2] 何帆[3] Qi Zhen Song Ligang He Fan
机构地区:[1]汕头大学商学院 [2]澳大利亚国立大学克劳福德公共政策学院 [3]北京大学汇丰商学院
出 处:《世界经济》2017年第8期120-142,共23页The Journal of World Economy
基 金:广东高校青年创新人才类项目(2016WQNCX039);汕头大学文科基金项目(7400115)的资助
摘 要:转型经济中政府对国有企业运营的深度参与,造成了国有企业监管中的多重委托代理问题。本文研究了渐进式转型国家中,国有企业监管体制的选择问题:监管体制能够影响监管者的激励和约束;集中监管体制在激励监管者上具有优势,而分散监管体制在防止监管俘获上具有优势;监管体制和市场结构的错配会导致监管的低效;随着转型国家市场竞争程度的提高,委托人可从分散监管体制到集中监管体制的转变中获益。中国的典型化事实和经验证据能够支持本文的理论假说。In gradual transition countries,the government’s deep involvement in the operation of SOEs gives rise to multi-principal-agent problem. This paper investigates the problem of optimal supervision regimes for supervising the state sector in gradual transition economies. It argues that the supervision regime can influence supervisor’s incentives and constraints: an integrated regime has advantage in motivating supervisors,while a separated regime has advantage in preventing supervisors from being captured by SOEs. Furthermore,the combination of supervision regime and market structure will affect supervision efficiency. A mismatch between market structure and supervision regime would lead to SOEs’ low efficiency. As market competition increases,the principal benefits in switching from the separated to the integrated supervision regime. Stylized facts and empirical evidence from China support our hypotheses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143