肌内效贴配合本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法治疗卒中后偏瘫性肩痛的临床疗效  

Clinical efficacy of Kinesio Tapping~ technology combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain

作　　者：雷迈[1] 吴旻[1] 卢斌[1] 金红花[1] 罗仲尔[1] 吴圣婕[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区江滨医院康复治疗科,南宁市530021

出　　处：《广西医学》2017年第8期1123-1124,1131,共3页Guangxi Medical Journal

基　　金：广西自然科学基金(2014GXNSFAA251001)

摘　　要：目的观察肌内效贴联合本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法(PNF)治疗卒中后偏瘫性肩痛(HSP)的临床疗效。方法卒中后HSP患者60例,按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。治疗组采用肌内效贴联合PNF技术治疗,对照组仅采用PNF技术治疗。两组疗程均8周,比较两组治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、上肢运动功能评分(FMA)和日常生活能力(BI)评分。结果治疗后两组患者VAS评分均下降,FMA评分、BI评分均提高,并且治疗组VAS评分低于对照组,FMA评分、BI评分高于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论肌内效贴联合PNF技术可改善卒中后HSP患者上肢运动功能,提高患者生活质量。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Kinesio Tapping technology combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation （PNF） for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain （HSP）. Methods A total of 60 patients with HSP after stroke were divided into treatment group and control group according to random number table, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with Kinesio Tapping technology combined with PNF, while the control group was treated with PNF alone. Both groups were treated for eight weeks. The scores of Visual Analogue Scale（ VAS）, Fugl-Meyer Assessment（FMA） and Barthel Index（BI） were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the VAS scores decreased while the scores of FMA and BI increased in both groups, and the treatment group had lower VAS scores and higher scores of FMA and BI compared to the control group（ all P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Kinesio Tapping technology combined with PNF can improve motor function of upper limbs and quality of life of pest-stroke patients with HSP.

关 键 词：偏瘫性肩痛 脑卒中 肌内效贴 本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法 

分 类 号：R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]