津巴多时间洞察力类型划分:基于聚类分析的结果  

Profiles of Zimbardo Time Perspective:Based on Cluster Analysis

作　　者：吕厚超[1] 杜刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学心理学部,重庆市400715

出　　处：《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第5期97-104,共8页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"青少年未来时间洞察力研究"(14BSH080);项目负责人:吕厚超;西南大学心理学部研究团队建设项目(TR201201-2);项目负责人:吕厚超;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助重大培育项目"时间洞察力的纵向发展及变化机制研究"(SWU1509389);项目负责人:吕厚超

摘　　要：基于ZTPI区分时间洞察力的类型,并探究不同类型在相关心理变量上的差异。对1264名大学生施测《津巴多时间洞察力量表》(ZTPI)中文版,在检验量表信效度和相关分析的基础上,采用聚类分析,形成五个类型:消极、冲动寻求、未来取向、平衡和宿命。宿命、未来取向、冲动寻求人数各占27.8%,27.2%和25.9%。未来取向和平衡类型在自尊、自我概念清晰度、人格特质、冲动性、网络成瘾和生活满意度上优于其他三个类型;不同于国外研究结果,虽然平衡类型是最优结果,但对中国大学生而言,未来取向在某些心理变量上优于平衡类型。Using ZTPI(Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory),this paper examines the association between membership in profiles about the ZTPI-Chinese vision and other psychosocial variables based on reliability,validity and correlation analysis.Participants consist of 1264university students in China.The results show that five ZTPI-C profiles are identified:Negative(8.6%),Impulsion-taking(25.9%),Future-oriented(27.2%),Balance(10.4%),and Fatalistic(27.8%).Future-oriented profile and Balance profile score higher than Negative Impulsion-taking,Fatalistic profile in the self-esteem,self-concept clarity,life satisfaction,extraversion,agreeableness,conscientiousness,and openness.However,Future-oriented profile and Balance profilescore lower than Negative,Impulsion-taking,Fatalistic profile in Internet addiction,impulsivity and neuroticism.Although'Balanced'time perspective has been suggested as optimal,the present study suggests that'Future-oriented'temporal profile is associated with more adaptive functioning.

关 键 词：ZTPI 时间洞察力 时间洞察力类型 聚类分析 平衡时间洞察力 

分 类 号：B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]