检察机关提起行政公益诉讼试点工作调研报告  

Research Report on Pilot Programme of Procuratorial Organ Initiating Administrative Public Interest Litigation

作　　者：孔祥稳 王玎[1] 余积明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2017年第5期87-98,共12页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金："检察机关提起行政公益诉讼试点工作评估"项目的阶段性成果。项目主持人为中国政法大学副校长;中国行政法学研究会会长马怀德教授;执行负责人为中国政法大学法治政府研究院副院长赵鹏副教授。课题组成员包括中国政法大学法治政府研究院副教授林华;中国政法大学法治政府研究院教师王翔;中国政法大学博士研究生孔祥稳;中国政法大学博士研究生王玎;中国政法大学博士研究生余积明;中国政法大学硕士研究生林稼朋;孔祥稳;王玎;余积明承担了调研报告的主要撰写工作

摘　　要：从本阶段试点来看,由检察机关提起行政公益诉讼,在完善行政诉讼架构、维护国家和社会公共利益、监督政府依法行政、强化行政检察监督工作、为全面推开行政公益诉讼提供参考样本等方面发挥了重要作用。但当前的行政公益诉讼还依然存在案件范围过于狭窄、线索发现及转化机制不畅、诉讼类型选择标准不明、诉前程序与诉讼程序对接不完善、检察机关诉讼地位不明、检察机关调查取证机制不完善、举证责任有待进一步明确、撤诉规则有待厘清、判决的履行与执行存在障碍等多方面问题。上述问题需要在下一步立法中得到解决。On the basis of current pilot programme, procuratorial organ initiating an administrative public interest litigation plays an important role in improving the framework of administrative litigation, protecting national and social public interests, supervising the law- based administration of government, enhancing the supervision of administrative inspection, providing a sample for comprehensively launching the procuratorial organ initiating an administrative public interest litigation, etc. However, the current administrative public interest litigation still has many problems. For example, the scope of cases is too narrow; the mechanism of discovering and transforming clues is not unblocked; the standard of choosing litigation type is not clear; the connection between pre-trial procedure and litigation procedure is not perfect; the functional status of procuratorial organ is not clear; the mechanism of procuratorial organ investigating and taking evidence is still not perfect; the burden of proof and rules of withdrawing a claim need to be clarified; the performance and implement of a verdict have many hindrances; etc. All of those problems should be solved in further legislation.

关 键 词：检察机关 行政公益诉讼 公共利益 公益诉讼人 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]