检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]荷兰蒂尔堡大学 [2]上海大学哲学系
出 处:《哲学分析》2017年第4期70-80,共11页Philosophical Analysis
摘 要:传统形而上学以统一性为主,反形而上学则以对立性为主。形而上学不是孤立的理性思辨,它与现实生活紧密相连,这尤其体现于对立统一。解构主义虽能释放多样性,但会败坏形而上学,以至于其自身沦为文字游戏。解构主义力争摆脱理性,反对既有秩序,用非理性决断论麻痹人们,使形而上学失去人们对其应有的信任。而未来有限理性的形而上学能有效回应多样与统一之间的辩证关系。Traditional metaphysics gives priority to unity over opposition, while anti-metaphysics would do the reverse, namely favoring opposition over unity. Metaphysics is closely related to the real life rather than an isolated rational speculation, particularly reflected in the unity of opposites. Although deconstructive philosophy can release diversity, it can corrupt metaphysics, so that it itself becomes a word game. Deconstruction strives to get rid of reason, to oppose the existing order, and to paralyze people with irrational decisions, so that metaphysics loses its due trust. Metaphysics of finite reason in the future can effectively respond to the dialectical relationship between pluralism and unity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117