检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昭通学院体育学院,云南昭通657000 [2]云南民族大学体育学院,云南昆明650031
出 处:《体育科技》2016年第5期41-43,共3页Sport Science and Technology
摘 要:随着运动训练理论的不断发展,三十多年来,"超量恢复"原理一度受到许多专家学者的质疑和批判,质疑声音也不断强烈。针对专家学者所提出的质疑和批判进行反思与论证,运用文献资料法及逻辑分析法等方法研究发现:更多的科学实验数据支撑了"超量恢复"现象解释整个机体不同器官和系统复杂适应机制;"超量恢复"是在一定负荷范围内给予"平台现象"及人体能力极限的解释;训练实践中,应将"超量恢复"及其它训练理论加以合理的综合应用,要辩证的去看待"超量恢复",而非"一棍子打死"。With the continuous development of sports training theories than 30 years, 'Excess Recovery' principle was questioned by many experts and criticism,questioning voice also been strong.In this paper,questions and criticism raised by experts and scholars to reflect and demonstrate,through the use of literature and logic analysis and other methods,the study found that more scientific experimental data support the 'excess recovery' explain the entire phenomenon different organs and systems complex adaptive mechanisms of the body; 'excess recovery' is given 'platform phenomenon' and the limits of human ability to explain within a certain load range;training practice,should be 'excess recovery' and other training theory to be reasonable integrated applications,to be dialectical to treat the 'excess recovery' rather than 'beat him to death.'
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222