检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安理工大学经济与管理学院,西安710054
出 处:《软科学》2017年第9期110-114,共5页Soft Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL109);教育部人文社会科学研究专项(14YJA630089;13YJAZH123)
摘 要:突破已有研究仅孤立地关注经理自主权与股权集中度各自对R&D投入影响的现状,将二者纳入到同一框架中更全面地探讨公司R&D投入的决定机制。结果表明:以职位权、所有权和专家权度量的经理自主权对公司R&D投入强度呈现显著的正向促进效应;以第一大股东持股比例、赫芬戴尔指数或前三大股东持股比例之和度量的股权集中度对R&D投入强度虽无显著直接效应,但对经理自主权与R&D投入强度的正相关性呈现显著正向调节效应。It is necessary for the scholars to bring these two factors in a same framework and further discuss the determining mechanism of the R&D expenditure in a comprehensive manner. Theoretical analyses and empirical data demonstrate that, managerial discretion which is measured by position power, ownership power and expert power has a significantly positive promotion on R&D expenditure intensity, while equity concentration which is measured by the proportion of the first larger shareholder has not a remarkable and direct effect on the intensity of the R&D expenditure, instead, equity concentration has a positive adjusting effect on the positive correlation between the R&D expenditure and managerial discretion. Robust test indicates that, whether considering the control variable or not, the conclusions above will not change as the measure- ment index of the managerial discretion and R&D expenditure or the samples change.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222