命名与论述中国的方式——对《中华民国解》的一种解读  

Naming and the Way of Discussing China:Reading An Interpretation of the Republic of China

作　　者：陕庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学人文与传媒学院

出　　处：《开放时代》2017年第5期76-93,共18页Open Times

摘　　要：《中华民国解》发表之时,"中华民国"这一称号已有一定的流传度,建国方案已广有争论。1907年论争各方都指向宪政这个中心议题,杨度的《金铁主义说》集中呈现出宪政讨论中的两个问题:宗法社会与民族的政治性。杨度与梁启超关于宪政问题的交流,以及他通过严复的翻译、理解对甄克思的接受,直接影响了《金铁主义说》的问题意识和观点。章太炎从"中国"的名称开始,展开对"华""夏"的释义,以及多民族、边疆问题的论述,从历史民族、政治民族的角度坚持民族的政治性,在与西方近代民族主义、国际法相对等的意义上论述中国的历史与未来,其方式具有超越于时效的理论意义。When"An Interpretation of the Republic of China"was published,the name"Republic of China"had already been circulated to some extent and the state-building plan had been widely debated.In 1907,all debating parties pointed to a central issue-constitutionalism,when Yang Du’s Gold and Iron Doctrine brought two issues about it into focus:patriarchal society and the political nature of a nation.His discussion on constitutionalism with Liang Qichao and acceptance of Edward Jenks’s thought through Yan Fu’s translation and interpretation,which had a direct influence on Gold and Iron Doctrine’s consciousness of problems and standpoint.Zhang Taiyan started from the name of"China"to develop his interpretation of hua and xia and his exposition on the issues of multi-nations and border regions.He upheld the political nature of a nation from the perspectives of historical nation and political nation,and discussed China’s history and future in the sense equivalent to modern nationalism and international law in the west.His approach has theoretical significance that transcends his time.

关 键 词：《中华民国解》 《社会通诠》 国际法 民族主义 华夏 

分 类 号：K257[历史地理—历史学]