法律道德主义适用于微小违法行为治理的可能与限度  

The Possibility and Limitation of Legal Moralism Applies to the Administration of Minor Violation

作　　者：陈骏[1] 苏晓宏[2] Chen Jun Su Xiaohong

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海200042 [2]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2017年第8期42-46,共5页Chongqing Social Sciences

基　　金：2017年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题项目"论认知风格对法官决策差异形成的影响"(批准号:17NDJC195YB);2017年度华东政法大学博士研究生第七期海外调研资助项目

摘　　要：法与道德关系是法理学的元命题,关于微小违法行为的规制路径便镶嵌其中。此类行为是一种违反公共道德、侵犯公共利益的微小过错行为,在陌生人社会的具体场景里,当前过于柔和、松散的法规范难以有效因应。通过对法律道德主义的还原与激活,从治理1.0向2.0迭代,能够以法律形式对不道德行为进行强制,所体现的硬度与密度在规范性层面能够对微小违法行为的治理产生实效。在法治政府主导下的推进国家治理能力现代化和治理体系现代化的大背景之下,法律道德主义的适用还应当保持与法律父爱主义的距离,在私人道德与公共道德、公共利益与公民权利之间,保持必要的合理性限度。The relationship between law and morality is the meta-proposition of jurisprudence, and the regulatory path of minor violations is embedded in it. Such behavior is a violation of public morality, violations of the public interest of the minor fault behavior, in the stranger society specific scene, the current is too soft, loose law norms difficult to effectively respond. Legal morality enforces unethical behavior in the form of law, and through the iteration of governance from 1.0 to 2.0, the hardness embodied in it can be effective at the normative level of the management of minor offenses. Under the background of strong government-led advancement of the modernization of state governance, it should also maintain a distance from legal patriarchy. In the private morality and public morality, public interest and civil rights, to maintain the necessary reasonable limits, and should not go beyond its boundaries.

关 键 词：微小违法行为 法律道德主义 父爱主义 规制路径 

分 类 号：D64[政治法律—政治学]