检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都市青羊区第九人民医院外科,四川成都610091 [2]四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院胃肠外科,四川成都610072
出 处:《实用医院临床杂志》2017年第5期220-222,共3页Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻(AIO)的临床疗效。方法 2014年11至2015年11月四川省人民医院胃肠外科收治的AIO患者41例,其中22例实施腹腔镜下粘连松解术(腹腔镜组),19例实施开腹手术(对照组),比较两组术中及术后相关指标。结果两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),腹腔镜组患者肛门通气时间、拔尿管时间以及住院天数均短于对照组(P<0.05),术中术后并发症及随访1年复发率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻疗效较好,复发率低,患者接受程度高,术中要规范操作,严格把握适应证。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery for adhesive intestinal obstruction (AIO). Methods Forty-one AIO patients from November 2014 to November 2015 were treated in Siehuan Provincial Hospital. Of these pa- tients ,22 were treated with laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) while 19 cases were treated with open surgery (control group). The relative indexes were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time between two groups was similar ( P 〉 0. 05 ) , but in the aspects of anal ventilation time, extubation time and hospitalization time in the laparoscopic group were shorter than that in the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The incidence of complications and 1-years recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group were lower than that in the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The laparoscopie surgery in the treatment of AIO is better and the recurrence rate is lower with high degree of acceptance. However, the operation should be standardized and strictly grasp the indications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15