检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小银[1] 刘广健[1] 周智洋[2] 孟晓春[2] 文艳玲[1] 余俊丽[1] 陈瑶[1] 程文捷[1] 覃斯 曹飞[1] 张文静 蒋清凌 王仪敏
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第六医院超声科,广东广州510655 [2]中山大学附属第六医院放射科,广东广州510655
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2017年第9期1357-1361,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的探讨经直肠超声(ERUS)术前评估直肠癌累及直肠系膜筋膜(MRF)的价值。方法 44例直肠癌患者术前均接受ERUS检查,其中18例接受新辅助放化疗,26例未接受;所有患者于接受ERUS检查后1周内行全直肠系膜切除手术(TME)。以术后病理诊断环周切缘(CRM)的结果为金标准,判断ERUS术前评估直肠癌累及MRF的诊断效能。结果 44例患者中,术后病理诊断T1期2例,T2期17例,T3期25例;CRM阳性2例,CRM阴性42例。低位直肠癌16例,中位直肠癌28例。肿瘤位于前壁和前侧壁26例,后壁和后侧壁13例,累及肠壁全周5例。ERUS对术前接受和未接受新辅助放化疗的患者诊断准确率分别为83.33%(15/18)和92.31%(24/26);肿物位于前壁和前侧壁时,诊断准确率为80.77%(21/26),而肿物位于后壁和后侧壁时为100%(13/13);对于低位和中位直肠癌,诊断准确率分别为75.00%(12/16)和96.43%(27/28);总准确率为88.64%(39/44)。结论 ERUS是术前评估直肠癌是否累及MRF的有效辅助检查方法。Objective To evaluate the value of endorectal ultrasonography(ERUS)in assessment of mesorectal fascia(MRF)invasion in rectal cancer.Methods Data of 44 patients who accepted preoperative ERUS and total mesorectal excision surgery within a week were retrospective analyzed.There were 18 patients who accepted preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 26 patients didn't acceped.Taking the pathological diagnosis of circumferential resection margin(CRM)as the "gold standard",the diagnostic efficiency of ERUS for the MRF invasion in rectal cancer was evaluated.ResultsThe final pathological T staging was T1 in 2cases,T2 in 17cases and T3 in 25cases.There were 2cases of CRM positive results,and 42 cases of CRM negative results.With regard to the location of tumor,there were 16 cases located in low,and 28 cases in mid rectum.There were 26 cases located in anterior or antero-lateral wall of rectum,13 cases in posterior or postero-lateral wall,and 5cases with a circle of rectum.The diagnostic accuracy were 83.33%(15/18)and 92.31%(24/26)for cases of accepting and not accepting the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy;80.77%(21/26)for cases located in anterior or antero-lateral wall,and 100%(13/13)for cases located in posterior or postero-lateral wall;75.00%(12/16)and 96.43%(27/28)for low position and mid position tumors.The total diagnostic accuracy was 88.64%(39/44).Conclusion ERUS can be an effective method in preoperative assessment of the MRF invasion in rectal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222