基于作者储备规模及作者生产率分布的中印、中日医学学科成熟度及科研实力分析  

Maturity and scientific research strength of medical subjects between PRC and India and between PRC and Japan according to the scale and production distribution of authors

作　　者：陈斯斯[1] 徐爽[1] 许丹[1] 邱宇红[1] 郭继军[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国医科大学图书馆,辽宁沈阳110112

出　　处：《中华医学图书情报杂志》2017年第7期21-26,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science

摘　　要：基于《学位授予和人才培养学科目录(2011)》(SCADC)医学学科与SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED(SCIE)医学学科映射,利用In Cites统计分析数据库、非回归拟合法、K-S检验以及Rnew拟合优度评估,分别对比研究中印、中日国际论文作者规模及作者生产率分布情况(洛特卡分布),揭示中印、中日医学学科的成熟度及科研实力。结果显示,两个学科分类体系映射出53个具体的医学学科,并进行洛特卡分布及作者规模分析,得出结论:与印度比较,我国热带医学、儿科学较印度学科成熟度及科研实力较低;与日本比较,我国药物滥用、中西医结合、初级卫生保健、医学信息学、寄生虫学、听力学及言语语言病理学学科成熟度及科研实力较强。The maturity and scientific research strength of medical subjects between PRC and India and between PRC and Japan were demonstrated by comparing the scale and production distribution of international papers authors between PRC and India and between PRC and Japan according to the SCADC（2011）,SCIE,In Cites Statistical Analysis Database,non-regression fitting curve,K-S Test and Rnew fitting goodness,which showed that SCADC（2011） and SCIE displayed 53 specific medical subjects.Lotka distribution and author scale analysis showed that the maturity and scientific research strength of tropical medicine and pediatrics were lower while those of drug abuse,combined traditional and western medicine,primary health care,medical informatics,parasitology,audiology,speech and language pathology were higher in PRC than in Japan.

关 键 词：洛特卡定律 医学学科 学科评价 对比分析 文献计量学 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]