检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]楚雄师范学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2017年第9期1400-1403,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:楚雄师范学院学术后备人才资助项目(编号:XJRC1614)
摘 要:目的:调查边疆民族地区地方院校大学生手机成瘾现状。方法:用戒断症状、突显行为、社交抚慰、心境改变4个因子组成的手机成瘾问卷对571名大学生进行调查。结果:(1)边疆民族地区地方院校学生手机成瘾各因子中等水平人数最多(59.4%~75.7%),高手机成瘾者(13.8%~18.2%)和低成瘾者(10.5%~22.6%)相对较少;(2)在手机成瘾总分上,独生子女得分显著高于非独生子女(t=3.17,P<0.01),谈恋爱者显著高于未谈恋爱者(t=2.28,P<0.05),大一学生显著低于大三学生(F=5.98,P<0.01);(3)在症状戒断因子得分上,独生子女显著高于非独生子女(t=3.14,P<0.01),谈恋爱者显著高于未谈恋爱者(t=2.68,P<0.01),城镇学生显著高于农村学生(t=2.18,P<0.05),大一学生显著低于大三学生(F=4.98,P<0.01);(4)在突显行为因子得分上,独生子女得分显著高于非独生子女(t=3.07,P<0.01),大一、大二学生显著低于大三学生(F=10.15,P<0.01);(5)在心境改变因子得分上,独生子女显著高于非独生子女(t=3.96,P<0.01),谈恋爱的显著高于未恋爱的(t=1.99,P<0.05),大一学生显著低于大三学生(F=4.18,P<0.01)。结论:边疆地区地方院校学生手机成瘾程度较高,本研究中等以上成瘾人数达85.9%。Objective:To investigate the present situation of local colleges students&#39;mobile phone addiction in fron-tier minority areas.Methods:Using withdrawal symptoms,highlighting behavior,social comfort,mood change four factors of mobile phone addiction questionnaire to survey 571 college students.Results:①College students&#39;mobile phone addiction in the frontier ethnic regions was the most in the medium level (59.4% ~ 75.7%);High mobile phone addicts(13.8% 18.2%)and low addicts(10.5% 22.6%)were relatively small;② On the cell phone addiction scores,only children scored significantly higher than the one-child(t =3.17,P 〈0.01),college students with fall in love scored higher than those with not to fall in love(t =2.28,P 〈0.05),freshman scored significantly lower than junior students(F =5.98,P 〈0.01);③ On the symptoms of withdrawal factor score,only children were significantly higher than the one-child(t =3.14,P 〈0.01 ),college students with fall-in-love were significantly higher than those who did not fall in love(t =2.68,P 〈0.01),urban students were significantly higher than rural students(t =2.18,P 〈0.05),freshman were significantly lower than junior(F =4.98,P 〈0.01 );④ In the highlighting behavior factor score,only children scored significantly higher than the one- child(t = 3.07,P 〈0.01 ),freshman and junior were significantly lower than sophomore students(F = 10.15,P 〈0.01);⑤ On the mood change factor score,only children were significantly higher than the one-child(t =3.96,P 〈0.01),fall in love were significantly higher than not to fall in love(t =1.99,P 〈0.05),freshman students were significantly lower than junior students(F =4.18,P 〈0.01).Conclusion:Local colleges students in frontier minority areas have higher mobile phone addiction,which is 85.9% in medium level and above.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.140.32