新世纪以来西方生活美学的内部论争及其反思  

Reflection on the Internal Debates of Western Everyday Aesthetics in the New Century

作　　者：田军[1] Tian Jun

机构地区：[1]福州大学人文社会科学学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《南京师范大学文学院学报》2017年第3期63-69,共7页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University

基　　金：2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"晚明文人的生活美学及其当代再生产研究"(编号:16YJC751023);2015年福建省中青年教师教育科研项目"当代西方生活美学思想研究"(编号:JAS150151)

摘　　要：新世纪以来西方生活美学的内部论争主要围绕三个问题展开:一是在生活美学的研究范围上形成了以凯文·梅尔齐奥尼为代表的限定性路径与以托马斯·莱迪为代表的扩展性路径之争。二是在日常生活审美经验的生成模式上形成了以莱迪为代表的超常模式与以斋藤百合子、雪莉·欧文和阿托·哈帕拉为代表的平常模式之争。三是在艺术与生活美学的关系上形成了以斋藤百合子为代表的主张分离与以莱迪为代表的主张融合之争。对上述论争进行反思:生活美学研究范围的界定应坚持限定性与开放性的统一;超常模式与平常模式之间的连续性和互动性值得重视,并可尝试建构日常生活审美经验生成的模型;处理艺术与生活美学的关系应兼顾二者的差异和联系,并注重探讨的思路。The internal debates of Western everyday aesthetics in the new century focus on three questions ： firstly, the debates of research domain of everyday aesthetics are between restrictive approach by Kevin Melchionne and expansive approach by Thomas Leddy ; Secondly, the debates of everyday aesthetic experience mode are between ordinary mode by Thomas Leddy and extraordinary mode by Yuriko Saito, Sherri Irvin and Arto Haapala ; Thirdly, the debates of the relationship of art and everyday aesthetics are between Yuriko Saito＇ s proposing separation and Thomas Leddy＇ s insisting integration. Reflection on the above debates ： the definition of research domain of everyday aesthetics should unify the restrictiveness and openness; the continuity and interaction of ordinary mode and extraordinary mode should not be neglected and the model of everyday aesthetic experience can be built; the differences and connections of art and everyday aesthetics and the discussion approach should be taken into consideration. The further solutions of internal debates of western everyday aesthetics depend on the practices of the everyday aesthetics.

关 键 词：西方生活美学 论争 思考 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]