检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左卫民
机构地区:[1]四川大学
出 处:《政法论坛》2017年第5期184-191,共8页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果
摘 要:近年来,随着司法改革的推进,学界和实务界开始重新审视刑事诉讼理论。但学界与实务界的分析思路或多或少地有些滞后,即将刑事诉讼视为单一价值观支配下的有机整体,而忽略其中的冲突与竞合。With the promotion of China' s judicial reform, both scholars and practitioners have begun to re - examine the theory of criminal procedure in recent years. However, the thoughts of analysis of scholars and practitioners is more -or- less lagging behind, that is regarding criminal procedure as an organic whole under the control of single value while ignoring the conflict and cooperation. The purpose of this paper is to clarify and analyze the book "The Limits of the Criminal Sanction" by Herbert L. Packer, and explain the prevailing conflict and cooperation in contemporary criminal procedure as well as paying tribute to the author, to provide enlightenment to the research on contemporary China' s criminal procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15