检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学信息与通信工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《系统工程与电子技术》2017年第10期2359-2367,共9页Systems Engineering and Electronics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(61175126)资助课题
摘 要:针对当前基于进化算法的相关反馈图像检索方法无法很好地结合用户偏好信息和设置参数过多的问题,提出一种基于改进教与学优化的相关反馈图像检索方法。根据图像检索问题的特定环境,对教与学优化算法进行了一系列改进:首先,结合最近邻分类法构造适应度函数的约束条件,使之更好地反映用户偏好信息;其次,通过在教阶段将相关图像集的中心图像作为教师以及在学阶段将相关图像作为学员学习的对象,使算法快速收敛到相关图像区域;最后,结合约束处理技术Deb准则进行学员的选择操作。将该算法与目前效果优异的3种基于进化算法的相关反馈技术在两套标准图像测试集上进行对比。结果表明,所提算法相较于另外3种算法具有明显的优势,能更好地结合用户偏好信息提高图像检索性能。Since the current content-based image retrieval with the relevance feedback (RF) methods based on the evolutionary algorithm could not well combine the user bias and need to set many parameters, a relevance feedback image retrieval method based on the improved teachingqearning-based optimization algorithm (ITLBO-RF) is proposed. Considering the situation of image retrieval, a series of improvements are implemen- ted. Firstly, combining with the nearest-neighbor approach, the fitness function with constraint is proposed for better reflecting the user bias. Secondly, the center of the relevant images is regarded as the teacher in the teacher phase and the relevant image is regarded as the learning object in the learner phase, which make the al- gorithm converge fast to the region of relevant images. Finally, the selection operation of students based on Deb standards is conducted. ITLBO-RF is compared with three state-of-the-art RFs based on the evolutionary algo- rithm on two benchmark images. The results show that ITLBO-RF has obvious advantage in comparison with other three algorithms, increases the performance of image retrieval and can better meet the user needs of image retrieval.
关 键 词:基于内容的图像检索 相关反馈 教与学优化算法 Deb准则
分 类 号:TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222