我国教唆犯法律性质新论  

Another Discussion on the legal Character of Abettor in China

作　　者：李鄂贤 徐颖[2] Li Exian Xu Ying

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院 [2]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《刑法论丛》2016年第3期229-255,共27页Criminal Law Review

摘　　要：我国刑事立法采取的是折中性共同犯罪人分类体制，即“以作用为主，兼顾分工”来划分共同犯罪人。立法将教唆犯单独设置为一条正是考虑了其在共同犯罪（广义的）中的地位和从事的活动。而“共同犯罪”之所以列入“犯罪”却不列入“刑罚”一章，首先要解决的就是定罪问题。在折中性体制下，就必然要运用新的两重性论来解释我国教唆犯的法律性质。可以肯定的是，《刑法》第29条第2款中教唆犯具备了从属性特征。这种定罪从属性并不是没有根据，它正是体现了刑法草案第33次稿所确立的立法初衷。而传统的具体两重性论并没有反映该立法宗旨，在解决定罪问题上就显得尤其困难。另外，运用该解释论分析第29条第1款规定也将会对教唆犯有一个全新的认识。总而言之，两重性新论的提出有利于正确认识立法。更有助于解决一些疑难问题。In our country, criminal legislation adopts a neutral classification method to accomplices, which classifies it mainly by function while also taking account of the division of work. Considering the status and activity of abettors in joint crimes, legislation sets up a single provision. In order to solve the problem of conviction, legislation classifies ＂joint crimes＂ into the chapter of ＂crime＂ instead of ＂punishment＂. With a neutral classification method to accomplices, it is inevitable to apply the new Theory of duality to explain the legal nature of abettors in our country. It is certain that there is one kind of characteristic about subservience of accomplice in the criminal law （ article 29, paragraph 2 ）. This subservience of conviction isn＇t without reason. It is no other than the original intention of legislation established by the criminal 33^rd draft while the old theory of duality don＇t reflect it so that the problem of conviction becomes much difficult. In addition, applying this method to explain article 29, paragraph 1, it also will be a new cognition. All in all, the new Theory of duality is not only useful to understand the legislation but help us solve some difficult questions.

关 键 词：共同犯罪人分类 立法例 教唆犯 定罪 两重性新论 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]