检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省濮阳市清丰县人民医院,河南濮阳457300
出 处:《转化医学电子杂志》2017年第9期42-43,共2页E-Journal of Translational Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较腹腔镜直肠癌手术与传统开腹直肠癌手术的临床疗效.方法:选取河南省濮阳市清丰县人民医院2013-04/2016-05收治的136例直肠癌患者作为研究对象,根据手术形式的不同,将患者分为对照组(n=68)以及研究组(n=68),对照组采取传统开腹手术治疗,研究组则采取腹腔镜手术进行治疗.对两组患者的临床疗效进行比较.结果:治疗后,两组患者在住院时间、术中出血量、切口长度以及肛门排气时间方面比较,研究组明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌较传统开腹手术的临床效果显著,安全性较高,大大降低了治疗风险,明显提高了患者的生活质量,值得临床推广.AIM: To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 136 rectal cancer patients admitted into Qingfeng People's Hospital of Puyang from April 2013 to May 2016 were selected as the study objects. According to the different forms of operation,the patients were divided into the control group and the study group,with 68 patients in each group. The control group was treated with conventional open surgery,while the study group was treated with laparoscopic surgery,and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. RESULTS: After treatment,the time of hospitalization,operation time,amount of bleeding during the operation,incision length and anal exhaust time of patients in the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group,with statistically significant differences( P〈0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more significant than that of the traditional open surgery with higher safety,which can significantly reduce the risk of treatment and improve the effect of patients' and quality of life and is worthy to be popularized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.97.0