检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗付岩[1] LUO Fu-yan(School of Management& Modem Enterprise Management Research Center, Guilin university of technology, Guilin 541004, China)
机构地区:[1]桂林理工大学管理学院/现代企业管理研究中心,广西桂林541004
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2017年第10期19-31,共13页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71562007);广西高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(15YB004)
摘 要:利用2005—2013年我国A股上市公司的数据,探讨了内部控制、吃喝腐败与企业绩效之间的关系。实证结果表明,内部控制与吃喝腐败负相关,而吃喝腐败与企业绩效显著负相关,这支持了腐败的"绊脚石"假说,即内部控制提升了企业吃喝腐败的边际价值。该结果具有一定的所有制异质性,即国有企业吃喝腐败的"绊脚石"效应要高于非国有企业,而内部控制对国有企业腐败的边际价值也高于非国有企业。This paper explores the relationship among internal control, eating and drinking corruption and firm performance, based on the data of A share listed companies during 2005-2013. The empirical results show that, the quality of internal control can significantly inhibit the phenomenon of corporate corruption on eating and drinking. Meanwhile, we know that the corruption signifi- cantly reduces finn performance, which supports "sand" hypothesis, that is, internal control could increase the marginal value of eating and drinking corruption. Further study shows that the "sand" effect of corruption for SOE is higher than that for Non-SOE, and the marginal value of internal control in SOE is higher than that in Non-SOE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229