《华盛顿协议》下工程教育专业建设路径选择  

Path Selection of Engineering Education Establishment from the Perspective of the Washington Accord

作　　者：刘宏伟[1] 苗补全 荀勇[1] 沈建新[3] 

机构地区：[1]盐城工学院土木工程学院,江苏盐城224051 [2]蒙克顿大学土木系 [3]盐城工学院高等教育研究所,江苏盐城224051

出　　处：《盐城工学院学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期73-76,共4页Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology（Social Science Edition）

基　　金：江苏省教育科学"十三五"规划课题(B-b/2016/01/14);江苏高校品牌专业建设工程项目(TAPP);盐城工学院教学改革研究项目(JY2015B23;JGZX2017B007)

摘　　要：比较《华盛顿协议》成员工程教育论证制度和各自特点,并比较美国工程教育评估和我国工程教育认证与"卓越计划",分析ABET工程教育认证标准和"卓越计划",借鉴《华盛顿协议》工程教育专业认证理念内容和标准条款,提出以工程教育专业认证为抓手,改革工程教育人才培养目标、课程结构体系,强化师资队伍建设的工程教育专业建设路径。This paper compares the engineering education systems and characteristics of the Washington Accord members,expounds the basic situation of engineering education evaluation in the United States,the engineering education accreditation and the EEETP（Excellent Engineers Education Training Plan） in China,and analyzes the standards of ABET and the tasks of the EEETP. Based on the basis of contents and standard terms of Washington Accord,the study concludes that the path selection of engineering education establishment should rely on the professional accreditation of engineering education,the reform of the training objectives and curriculum structure systems,and the strengthening of the construction of teacher team.

关 键 词：《华盛顿协议》 “卓越计划” 工程教育 

分 类 号：G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]