APP英语口语考试信度的实证分析——以FiF口语训练APP为例  

Reliability of APP Oral Proficiency Interview: a Case Study of “FiF” APP

作　　者：连朝霞 

机构地区：[1]厦门理工学院外国语学院,福建厦门361024

出　　处：《厦门理工学院学报》2017年第4期65-70,共6页Journal of Xiamen University of Technology

基　　金：厦门理工学院教育教学改革与建设项目(JGZ201613)

摘　　要：为检验APP英语口语考试的信度,以FiF口语训练APP为例,安排420名考生分别参加APP口语考试与传统面试型口语考试。通过与传统口语考试的成绩比较分析APP口语考试的信度。研究发现:两种测试方法具有较好的内部一致性,评分没有明显差异,信度良好;APP口语考试与传统面试型口语考试成绩显著相关,具有较好的效度及可替代性;APP口语考试的优势是可缩短考生考试等待时长、节省教师人力、即时且客观地打出分数;但APP的施测维度具有局限性,主要适用于常规能力测试,而交际口试题型应选择传统面试型口语方式考试。This paper made a comparable study of the reliability , validity and correlation of A O P I based on theperformance of 420 candidates in A P P Oral Proficiency Interview （ A O P I ） and Oral Proficiency Interview（OPI） respectively. Research shows that both A O P I and OPI have high validity and reliability. There is nosignificant difference between their ratings, but rather, there is significant correlation between A O P I and OPIscores. A O P I can replace OPI to an extent. Its advantage lies in a much shorter wait for the candidates , reducedmarking manpower and immediate and objective scoring. However, A O P I is limited in the testing dimensionsand OPI is preferable for communicative types of questions.

关 键 词：英语 APP口语考试 信度 复本信度检验法 

分 类 号：H310.4[语言文字—英语]