高丽时期诗论《补闲集》与《破闲集》比较  

Comparing BohanJip to PahanJip in the Period of Kaokouli in Korea

作　　者：姜夏 尹允镇[2] Jiang Xia Yin Yunzhen

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012 [2]吉林大学外国语学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2017年第9期106-111,共6页Chongqing Social Sciences

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金项目"高丽时期朝鲜诗人对中国文论的吸收与改造"(批准号:2016BS66)

摘　　要：高丽时期是朝鲜古代汉文学发展的第一个黄金时期,朝鲜诗话也出现于此时。这里重点研究高丽时期的诗话集《补闲集》,将之与《破闲集》进行比较,从中窥探朝鲜古代诗学思想的早期构建。分析发现《补闲集》中收录的作家和诗作在数量上远多于《破闲集》,所反映的文学批评观点也更加客观和系统,同时在欧阳修《归田录》的影响下添加了"笑谈"和"国史补"要素,兼具文学意义和史料价值,是一部接受并融合了本国传统和外国文学的著作。Goryo Dynasty is the golden age in the history of Korean-Chinese literatures.Korean poetical talks are also appeared at that time.With the angle of comparison, We mainly explore the similarities and differences between BohanJip and PahanJip and try to outline theearly ancient Korean literary criticism. BohanJip included more poets and poems than PahanJip and literary criticisms are more objective and more systematic. Under the influence of Ou Yangxiu＇s Guitianlu, BohanJip also added elements of funny stories and supplyment of the nation history. As a result, BohanJip not only has literary significance but also historical significance and combines ancient Korea＇s traditional and elements of foreign literature as a whole.

关 键 词：崔滋 《补闲集》 《破闲集》 文学批评 外国文学 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]