犯罪构成视野下的侦查取证新论——“以审判为中心”诉讼制度改革实践路径探索  

A New Approach to the Collection of Investigation Evidence under the Perspective of Crime Constitution

作　　者：揭萍[1,2] JIE Ping(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120 Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou 310053, China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120 [2]浙江警察学院,浙江杭州310053

出　　处：《现代法学》2017年第5期120-131,共12页Modern Law Science

基　　金：2015年公安部软科学理论研究课题"正当程序理念下侦查权力约束机制的改革与完善"(2015LLYJJXST039)

摘　　要："以审判为中心"的根本是要求刑事诉讼各阶段都要贯彻证据裁判规则,以证据为核心。刑事诉讼是建立在既有犯罪事实基础之上开展的与刑法契合性的查证判断过程,侦查取证的本质是对犯罪构成事实的发现与证明,犯罪构成要件的可证明性是侦查取证的逻辑起点。在侦查程序中,实施案件事实递进判断是犯罪构成的主要功能,侦查不同阶段犯罪构成要件查证重点和运用次序存在差异;围绕行为主观要件查证这一核心夯实行为客观方面证据材料才能为审判阶段的事实认定与法律裁量奠定良性基础。The fundamental demand of the reform of ＂litigation system centered on judgment＂is to implement the rule of judging by evidence in different stages of the criminal procedure. Criminal procedure is a particular judgment verification process with criminal law established upon the basis of a criminal fact. The nature of evidence investigation is to discover and prove facts of crime constitution,and the vindicability of the crime constitution is the logical starting point of the investigation evidence collection. In the investigation procedure,the progressive implementation of the case facts judgment is the main function of crime constitution. The focus and the usage order of the crime constitution are different at different criminal investigation stages. Consolidating crime objective evidences around the crime subjective element can lay a good foundation to verify facts and make legal discretions in the trial stage.

关 键 词：以审判为中心 犯罪构成 侦查取证 主观要件证明 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]