检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省湛江中心人民医院妇产科,广东湛江524037
出 处:《广东医科大学学报》2017年第3期315-317,共3页Journal of Guangdong Medical University
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的临床疗效。方法 120例宫颈癌患者分别行腹腔镜和开腹手术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、盆腔淋巴结清扫数目、住院时间、并发症等情况。结果与开腹组比较,腹腔镜组术中出血量少、住院时间短、并发症(内脏损伤、淋巴囊肿及切口感染)少,淋巴结清扫数目多,但手术时间长(P<0.01或0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌具有创伤小、康复快、并发症少等优点。Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic and transabdominal surgery for cervical cancer. Methods A total of 120 patients with cervical cancer underwent laparoscopic or transabdominal surgery. The operation time, blood loss, number of pelvic lymph node dissection, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared between two groups. Results Compared with transabdominal surgery, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications were decreased, while operation time and number of pelvic lymph node dissection increased (P〈0.01 or 0.05). Conclusion Lapar- oscopic surgery is of little trauma, rapid recuperation, and few complications for cerical cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15