检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张万生[1] 王立国[1] 于航[1] 郭彬彬[1] 韩冬[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林医药学院附属医院泌尿外科,吉林吉林132013
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2017年第23期87-90,共4页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取2010年1月-2015年7月该院42例肾肿瘤患者,根据随机数字法,将其分为开放手术组(开放肾部分切除术)和腹腔镜手术组(后腹腔镜肾部分切除术),每组各21例,比较两组手术时间、Scr水平、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、根据视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)及术后并发症。结果腹腔镜手术组手术时间及手术前后Scr水平与开放手术组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与开放手术组比较,腹腔镜手术组术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间均缩短,术中出血量更少,术后1周VAS降低;与开放手术组比较,腹腔镜手术组术后并发症发生率降低。结论对于肾肿瘤患者,后腹腔镜肾部分切除术作为一种安全、有效的手术方式,值得临床推广。Objective To study the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. Methods The 42 patients with renal tumors in our hospital during the period from January 2010 to July 2015 were randomized into open surgery group(open partial nephrectomy) and laparoscopic surgery group(retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) according to the random number method with 21 patients per group. The operation time, Scr, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization time, VAS score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in the operation time or preoperative or postoperative Scr level between the two groups(P〉0.05). Compared with the open surgery group, the postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function and hospitalization time were shortened, the intraoperative blood loss was less,the postoperative VAS score decreased and the incidences of postoperative complications were reduced in the laparoscopic surgery group(P〈0.05). Conclusions For the renal tumor patients, the retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective surgical method, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30