机构地区:[1]哈励逊国际和平医院泌尿外科,河北衡水053000 [2]哈励逊国际和平医院心内科,河北衡水053000
出 处:《临床和实验医学杂志》2017年第19期1928-1931,共4页Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨微小染色体维持蛋白(MCM5)在膀胱肿瘤组织和尿脱落细胞中的表达及对膀胱肿瘤复发检测预后价值。方法选取2016~2017年膀胱癌患者72例、泌尿系统疾病者60例和健康体检者60例资料进行回顾性分析,均取膀胱组织标本和尿脱落细胞标本进行MCM5检测。并进行尿细胞学检查,比较不同检查方法的特异度、敏感度。结果在膀胱癌患者膀胱肿瘤组织中,随着病理分级、临床分期增加,其MCM5表达量升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在膀胱癌尿脱落细胞中,有64例(88.89%)MCM5表达阳性,与对照组和泌尿系统疾病组比较,膀胱癌患者尿脱落细胞中MCM5表达水平升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随着病理分级及临床分期增加,膀胱癌患者尿脱落细胞中MCM5表达量升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但在MCM5阳性表达方面差异无统计学意义(P<0.05);且初发和复发患者MCM5阳性率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);尿细胞学检查与MCM5检测的特异度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与尿细胞学检查比较,MCM5检测的敏感度升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论随着病理分级及临床分期增加,膀胱癌患者膀胱肿瘤组织和尿脱落细胞中MCM5表达量升高,膀胱癌患者进行MCM5检测,对检测膀胱肿瘤组织复发及预后判断有重要作用。Objective To investigate the expression of micro-chromosome maintenance protein( MCM5) in bladder tumor tissues and urinary exfoliated cells and its prognostic value of bladder tumor recurrence. Methods 72 cases of bladder cancer,60 cases of urinary system diseases and 60 cases of healthy physical examination in our hospital from January 2016 to 2017 were selected and taken their samples of bladder tissue and urine exfoliated cells for MCM5 examination and cytological examination. The specificity and sensitivity of different examinations were compared. Results For patients with bladder cancer,the expression of MCM5 increased with the increase of pathological grading and clinical staging,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). In the aspect of bladder cancer urinary exfoliated cells,64 cases( 88. 89%) had positive expression of MCM5,and compared with the control group and the urinary system disease group,the expression level of MCM5 in urinary exfoliated cells of bladder cancer patients was increased,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). With the increase of pathological grading and clinical staging,the expression of MCM5 in urinary exfoliated cells of bladder cancer patients was increased,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05),but there was no significant difference in MCM5 positive expression( P〈0. 05). And there was no significant difference in the positive rate of MCM5 between primary and recurrent patients( P〈0. 05). The comparison between the specificity of the urine cytology test and the MCM5 test was not statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Compared with the urine cytology test,the sensitivity of MCM5 detection was increased,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion With the increase of pathological grade and clinical stage,the expression of MCM5 in bladder cancer tissue and urinary exfoliated cells increase in bladder cancer patients. MCM5 was detected in bladder cancer patients
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...