检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓伟[1]
机构地区:[1]兰州大学法学院,兰州730000
出 处:《中原工学院学报》2017年第5期48-55,共8页Journal of Zhongyuan University of Technology
摘 要:对于著作权犯罪,我国刑法规定了侵犯著作权罪和销售侵权复制品罪两个罪名,分别规制侵犯著作权的行为和销售侵权复制品的行为。但是,司法实践对著作权犯罪行为的认定依然存在诸多问题,如对著作权犯罪与非法经营罪认定上的混乱,缺乏对被害人经济损失的救济,罚金刑和资格刑适用上的缺陷,对买方市场规范的漏洞等。为了有效打击著作权犯罪,实现刑法保护著作权的目的,针对司法实践中存在的这些问题,有必要予以澄清,为刑法的准确适用提供明确的法律根据。As for copyright crime,our criminal law provides for the crime of infringing the copyright and the crime of sale of infringing copies,respectively,to regulate the behavior of the infringement of copyright and the sale of copyright infringement copies.However,there are still many problems in the judicial practice,such as the confrontation between the crime of copyright and the crime of illegal business;lack of relief to the economic loss of the victim;the defects of applying to penalty and qualification penalty;vulnerability to buyer's market rules.In order to effectively combat copyright crime,to achieve the purpose of criminal protection of copyright,in view of these problems in judicial practice,it is necessary to clarify and provide clear legal basis for the accurate application of criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147