检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药科学》2017年第20期186-188,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy
基 金:广东省清远市科技计划项目(2014B120)
摘 要:目的腹腔镜下治疗前列腺癌的研究。方法回顾性分析我院2008年2月~2017年6月收治的前列腺癌患者45例临床资料,对照组(n=20)实施开放性耻骨后前列腺癌根治术治疗,观察组(n=25)实施腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术治疗,对比分析两组患者临床指标、治疗效果和不良反应发生率。结果观察组在手术时间、术中出血量、导管留置时间、尿控能力恢复时间和住院时间等临床指标中均明显低于对照组,经统计学对比分析,组间对比差异有意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗总有效率为96.00%,不良反应发生率为4.00%,对照组治疗总有效率为55.00%,对照组不良反应发生率为40.00%,统计学对比分析有意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜能够更好的治疗前列腺癌患者,有利于患者尽早恢复健康,具有较高的临床应用价值。Objective To study the treatment of prostate cancer by laparoscopy. Methods The clinical data of 45prostate cancer patients treated in our hospital from February 2008 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The control group (n=20) was treated with open radical prostatectomy, and the observation group (n=25) was treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The clinical indicators, treatment effect and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, catheter indwelling time, urinary continence, recovery time and length of stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 96%, the adverse reaction rate of the observation group was 4%, the total effective rate of the control group was 55%, and the control group adverse reaction rate was 40%, the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopy can better treat patients with prostate cancer, which is beneficial to the early recovery of patients' health and has high clinical application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147