检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟石磊
机构地区:[1]辽宁公安司法管理干部学院,辽宁沈阳110161
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2017年第5期67-71,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:由于我国司法实务中存在着审判对侦查卷宗过度依赖,而产生了"先定后审""先判后审"的现象;司法裁判行政化对司法原则及功能的破坏,而产生了"陪而不审""审者不判、判者不审"的现象。上述问题深刻制约着"审判中心主义"的良好诉讼制度格局的形成。有必要从司法实务层面,对制约以审判为中心诉讼制度形成的原因加以探究,以期开拓理论视野。Because of the excessive reliance on the investigation files in the judicial practice in China,there are phenomena of "pre-determined trial "and "pre-judged trial ".The administration of judicial judgment has destroyed the judicial principles and functions,so there are phenomena of "attending but not to try "and "judgment without trial or trial without judgment".These phenomena profoundly constrain the formation of the good litigation system of "trial-center".It is necessary to explore the reasons for restraining "trial-centered"litigation system from the judicial practice level,with a view to open up the theoretical perspective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.33.204