片段弓技术和超强玻璃纤维牙周夹板松牙固定的疗效比较  

Efficacy of segmental arch technique and fiber-reinforced composite periodontal splint( FRC) in the fixation of loose teeth: a comparative study

作　　者：毛斌 王凡 杨庆福 徐美丹 朱永武 应凯 

机构地区：[1]永康市第一人民医院口腔科,浙江永康321300

出　　处：《健康研究》2017年第5期529-531,534,共4页Health Research

摘　　要：目的比较片段弓技术和超强玻璃纤维牙周夹板用于牙周病松牙固定的疗效。方法将诊断为重度牙周炎的81名牙周病患者随机分为两组,分别采用片段弓技术和超强玻璃纤维牙周夹板对松动牙进行固定,并于术后的1个月、3个月、6个月对两组的治疗效果和相关指标进行比较。结果术后6个月时,超强玻璃纤维牙周夹板组固定有效率达97.6%,高于片段弓组(84.2%),且附着丧失(CAL)和探诊深度(PD)的改善上,超强玻璃纤维组也更为显著,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与片段弓牙周夹板相比,超强玻璃纤维牙周夹板用于牙周病松牙固定更为有效。Objective To evaluate theefficacy of the segmental arch technique and fiber-reinforced composite periodontal splint（ FRC） in fixing loose teeth. Method 81 patients with severe periodontitis were randomly divided into 2 groups,one group treated with segmental arch technique and the other with FRC periodontal splint. The clinical effects of the two kinds of periodontalsplints and periodontal indexes were compared at 1,3 and 6 months after splinting. Results The clinical effects in the group treated with FRC periodontal splint（ 97.6%） were significantly better than those in the segmental arch technique group（ 84.2%） at 6 months（ P〈0. 05）. The clinical attachment loss（ CAL） and the probing depth（ PD） were better in the group treated with FRC periodontal splint than the group treated withsegmental arch technique at 6 months（ P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Compared with the segmental arch technique,the FRC periodontal splint is more efficient in fixing loose teeth.

关 键 词：牙周夹板 松动牙固定 片段弓技术 超强玻璃纤维 

分 类 号：R781.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]