检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王敬[1] 黄卫东[1] 胡礼明[1] 陶学金[2] WANG Jing HUANG Wei- dong HU Li-ming TAO Xuejin(Department of Stomatology, Xiaogan Central Hospital, Hubei Xiaogan 432000, China Department of Stomatology , Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Wuhan 430030, China.)
机构地区:[1]孝感市中心医院口腔科,湖北孝感432000 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院口腔科,湖北武汉430030
出 处:《临床口腔医学杂志》2017年第10期623-625,共3页Journal of Clinical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:对比分析Locator和球帽附着体系统支持的下颌种植覆盖义齿咀嚼效率。方法:选取全口无牙牙合患者16例,随机分成2组;下颌植入2枚种植体后分别使用Locator和球帽附着体系统完成覆盖义齿修复,分别设为(LCT)组和(BAC)组,3个月后分别计算咀嚼效率。结果:下颌种植覆盖义齿使用Locator或球帽附着系统咀嚼效率增加量差异无统计学意义。结论:种植覆盖义齿使用Locator或球帽附着系统均能有效提高咀嚼效率,均值得临床推广。Objective:This crossover study aimed to evaluate and compare chewing efficiency with Locator and ballcap systems of of implant overdentures in mandibles.Methods:Sixteen edentulous patients with two implants were inserted in the mandible.In a random method,overdentures were connected to the implants with either Locator(LCT) or ball-cap(BAC)systems.Three months after osseointegration,increased masticatory efficiencies were figured out.Results:There was no significant difference between the two groups referring to increased chewing efficiency(P〉0.05).Conclusion:Masticatory efficiency of patients restored by implant overdentures can be enhanced both with Locator and ball-cap systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225