检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴辉星
出 处:《包头医学院学报》2017年第9期69-71,共3页Journal of Baotou Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨局限性胰腺炎的临床CT诊断价值。方法:选择2010年1月至2016年12月诊治的160例局限性胰腺炎患者作为观察组,将同期入院就诊的160例普通胰腺炎患者作为对照组,两组都进行常规CT与CT增强扫描分析诊断。结果:两组在肾筋膜形态改变、假性囊肿发生率等CT表现上对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的单个CT征象、胰腺大与胰腺不清的发生率高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的BF、BV值低于对照组(P<0.05),而MTT与PS值高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:局限性胰腺炎的临床CT诊断能有效提高鉴别与诊断的准确性及有效性,具有较好的影像学特征与定量参数,有较好的应用价值。Objective: To investigate the clinical value of CT in the diagnosis of localized pancreatitis. Methods: 160 cases of patients with localized pancreatitis who were diagnosed and treated from January 2010 to December 2016 were enrolled in observation group,and 160 patients with common pancreatitis were admitted to control group. The patients in both groups were diagnosed with conventional CT and CT enhanced scan. Results: There was no significant difference in the changes of renal fascia morphology and the incidence of pseudocyst in the two groups( P 〉 0. 05). The incidence rates of single CT sign,pancreatic enlargement and unclear pancreas in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group( P 〈 0. 05). The BF and BV values in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group,while the MTT and PS values were significantly higher than those in control group( P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion: The clinical CT diagnosis of localized pancreatitis can effectively improve the accuracy and effectiveness of identification and diagnosis,with good imaging features and quantitative parameters. It has a good application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222