检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李海霞[1]
出 处:《管理评论》2017年第10期198-210,共13页Management Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(14CJY073);辽宁省社科规划基金项目(L16BGL009)
摘 要:本文对我国A股上市公司CEO权力、风险承担与公司成长性之间的关系进行了实证研究。研究发现:CEO权力与公司风险承担正相关;与非国有上市公司相比,CEO集权对风险承担的影响在国有上市公司中更加突出;进一步,公司风险承担对公司成长性具有显著的拖累效应,即风险承担水平越高,公司成长性越差;风险承担的这种拖累效应在国有上市公司中表现地更为显著。本研究对于制约上市公司尤其是国有上市公司CEO集权、合理控制风险、提高公司成长性等问题提供了一定的理论支持和解决思路。Based on the data of China's A-share listed companies,we conduct some empirical studies and reach the following conclusions on the relationship among CEO power,risk-taking and corporate growth:( 1) the more power a CEO has,the higher risk his company companies will face;( 2) the effect of CEO power on corporate risk-taking in state owned companies is higher than that in non-state owned companies;( 3) further,the risk-taking has a significant drag effect on corporate growth,that is to say,the higher risk a company faces,the worse its growth will be;( 4) the negative effect of corporate risk-taking on corporate growth in state owned companies is more significant than that in non-state owned companies. This study provides some theoretical basis and solutions for listed companies,especially listed SOEs,to effectively prevent the over-centralization of CEO's power,take reasonable control of corporate risk-taking and improve corporate growth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3