检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘贺[1] 钱君荣[1] 耿海霞[1,2] Hu He Qian Jun-rong GENG Hai-xia(Department of Stomatology, Affliated Hospital of Jining Medical College,Shandong Jining 272029 School of Stomatology, Jining Medical University,Shandong Jining 272013,China)
机构地区:[1]济宁医学院附属医院口腔科,山东济宁272029 [2]济宁医学院口腔学院,山东济宁272013
出 处:《全科口腔医学电子杂志》2016年第13期30-32,共3页Electronic Journal of General Stomatology
基 金:济宁医学院科研计划项目(JY2015KJ028)
摘 要:目的评估布洛芬不同给药方式对一次性根管治疗术后疼痛控制效果的影响。方法 90例上颌前磨牙、磨牙不可复性牙髓炎行一次性根管治疗的患者,随机分为对照组、按需给药组和规律给药组,分别于术后24小时和48小时对术后疼痛进行评分。Mann-Whiney、chi-square、Fisher exact以及Mc Nemar检验对数据进行统计分析。结果对照组、按需给药组和规律给药组患者术后24小时或48小时疼痛均无明显差异(P>0.05)。规律给药组患者布洛芬使用量明显多于对照组和按需给药组(P<0.05)。结论布洛芬按需给药、规律给药等不同给药方式均不能有效控制一次性根管治疗术后疼痛。Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different ibuprofen prescription strategies on postoperative pain management of single visit root canal treatment. Methods Ninety maxillary premolar and molar teeth had single-visit root canal treatment. After this treatment, patients were randomly allocated to 3 groupscontrol group, on-demand group and regular prescription group.The patients were asked to rate their pain on a visual analog scale for up to 48 hours after treatment. The data were analyzed with Mann-Whiney, chi-square, Fisher exact, and McNemar tests. Results Data analysis showed no signifcant difference in pain felt by the patients in control group, on-demand group and regular prescription group at either 24 or 48 hours. after treatment (P〉0.05).Patients in regular prescription group used signifcantly more medication compared with patients in control group and on-demand group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Ibuprofen on-demand and regular prescription had no signifcant effect on postoperative pain management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117