非法证据排除制度功能定位反思  

The Introspection of the Functional Orientation of the Illegal Evidence Exclusion System

作　　者：雷振斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]鲁东大学法学院,山东烟台264025

出　　处：《中州大学学报》2017年第5期49-56,共8页Journal of Zhongzhou University

基　　金：山东省高校人文社科项目"非法证据排除制度绩效实证研究"(J13WH51)

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则虽然在我国已经正式确立,但对于该制度的功能定位在理论和司法实践中并未形成共识,由此也影响到该制度的立法设计和司法适用的效果。目前,"虚伪排除"仍然是该制度功能的实然定位。这种定位虽然与我国刑事诉讼现存的利益观念、诉讼结构、立法技术相适应,但已经不符合未来刑事诉讼的发展方向。为了最大限度地发挥非法证据排除的功能,应当实现从"虚伪排除"到"正当程序"的转型。Although the illegal evidence exclusion rale has been officially established in our country, the func-tion location of the system has not reach a consensus in the theory a d judicial practice, which affects the legislative design of the system and the effect of the judicial application. At present,“alse exclusion” is still a reality locationof this system, s function. Although the location adapts to the interests of the criminal lawsuit, action structure andlegislation technology of our country, it does not conform to the development direction of future. In order to maximize the function of the illegal evidence exclusion, we shall achieve the transformation fromufalse exclusion” to Udue process”.

关 键 词：非法证据排除 虚伪排除 正当程序 

分 类 号：D925.213[政治法律—诉讼法学]