检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:商嵩山
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2017年第21期3347-3349,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨经颈胸腹三切口根治手术治疗中上段食管癌的疗效和安全性。方法将2014年7月至2017年3月本院收治的60例中上段食管癌患者随机分为两组,各30例;对照组患者行左胸食管根治术,实验组患者行经颈胸腹三切口根治术,比较两组手术指标及并发症发生率。结果实验组手术时间与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);实验组术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目及术后引流量等指标均显著优于对照组,并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论经颈胸腹三切口根治手术是治疗中上段食管癌安全有效的方式,淋巴结清扫数目更多,安全性更高,值得推广。Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of radical surgery through cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions for middle and upper esophageal carcinoma. Methods 60 patients with middle and upper esophageal cancer treated at our hospital from July, 2014 to March, 2017 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, 30 for each group. The control group were treated by radical surgery through left chest incision and the experimental group through cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions. The surgical indicators and the incidence of complications were compared between these two groups. Results There was no statistical differer.ce in operation time between these two groups (P 〉 0.05). The bleeding volume, the cleaned lymph node number, the postoperative drainage volume, etc. were better and the incidence of complications was lower in the experimental group than in the control group, with statistical differences (all P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Radical surgery through cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions for middle and upper esophageal carcinoma is effective and safe and can clean many lymph nodes, so it is worth being generalized.
关 键 词:经颈胸腹三切口根治术 中上段食管癌 临床疗效 安全性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171