检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余铭[1] 薛迪新[1] 施正超[1] 陈澄亮 贺新伟[1] 陈积贤[1] 马小红[2] Ming Yu;Di-xin Xue;Zheng-chao Shi;Cheng-liang Chen;Xin-wei He;Ji-xian Chen;Xiao-hong Ma(Department of Surgical Oncology, Rui’an People’s Hospital, Rui’an, Zhejiang 325200, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China)
机构地区:[1]浙江省瑞安市人民医院肿瘤外科,浙江瑞安325200 [2]浙江医院消化科,浙江杭州310013
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2017年第11期68-73,共6页China Journal of Endoscopy
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与开腹手术的疗效,探讨腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术的可行性。方法选取浙江省瑞安市人民医院2008年10月-2013年8月收治的胃癌患者,根据患者采取的手术方式不同分为两组,其中175例腹腔镜手术患者纳入腹腔镜组,163例开腹手术患者纳入开腹组。比较两组患者的术中及术后情况、淋巴结清扫数目、并发症及肿瘤根治程度等。结果腹腔镜组清扫淋巴结(26.3±13.9)枚,开腹组清扫淋巴结(26.8±10.2)枚,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.40,P=0.684)。腹腔镜组术中出血情况以及术后排气时间均优于开腹组。腹腔镜组患者术后住院时间小于开腹组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组的3年生存率为92.00%,与开腹组92.63%相比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.54,P=0.262)。结论腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术具有安全、术后恢复快和创伤小等优点,同时能够达到与开腹组相近的淋巴结清扫效果。Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with D2 dissection by comparing the effcacy of open surgery on radical gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer patients. Methods The patients with gastric cancer from October 2008 to August 2013 were divided into two groups according to the different surgical methods. Among them, 175 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopy-assisted surgery group, Group L), and 163 patients underwent laparotomy surgery (open surgery group, Group O). The number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative recovery, complications, mortality and survival rate of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes resect between the two groups [Group L and Group O: (26.3 ± 13.9) vs (26.8 ± 10.2), t = -0.40, P = 0.684]. Compared with open surgery, the laparoscopy-assisted surgery showed signifcantly less intraoperative blood loss and quicker recovery of gastrointestinal function. The postoperative hospitalization time of laparoscopic group was less than that of laparotomy group, the difference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). No signifcant difference was found in 3-year survival rate between the two groups (Group L vs Group O: 92.00% vs 92.63%, P = 0.262). Conclusions Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic gastrectomy is safer and has quicker postoperative recovery. There is no statistical difference in the number of resect lymph nodes between lapamscopic and open gastrectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145