西周中期王朝卜官的性格与身份——重读《曶鼎铭》第二段  

The Identity and Character of the Augur of Middle Western Zhou Dynasty——Reinterpretation of the Second Paragraph of Hu Ding Inscription

作　　者：吕利[1] LY Li(College of Marxism,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234, Chin)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学马克思主义学院,上海200234

出　　处：《枣庄学院学报》2017年第6期78-88,共11页Journal of Zaozhuang University

摘　　要：曶鼎铭问世至今200多年,关于铭文第二段的解释依然是众说纷纭、扑簌迷离。客观上,确是铭文底部残损所致;但研究者主观上一致认定作器人曶是"匹马束丝赎五夫案"的一方当事人,也是症结所在。汉《二年律令·史律》显示,作为畴人子弟的史、卜、祝皆属于广义上的史,其中史、卜学童学业既成,绝大部分人进入各级官府充当文职小吏——官佐、史,而非担任专职礼官。这和《周礼》所载数量众多的府、史情势大体一致。曶的家族虽世代传习担任王朝卜官,但在正式获得王的册命之前,有可能充任府、史之类文书吏员,比如追随井叔,办理诉讼事务。以此为线索,可以尝试重新解读这段铭文。It has been over 200 years since Hu Ding inscription was found . Many scholars participated in the study on the in -scription , and have given many different interpretations on its second section . Although there are so many different opinions, but almost aQ of the researchers admit that Hu was one party of this case . Because he was the owner of the bronzeware , the in -scription could only record his own deeds or his family affairs . And Hu was the augur of Zhou Dynasty , that was a hereditary position , so he could not have held other office in his life . But there are a number of evidences that Hu might have served as the junior officers before he was formally appointed as a augur by the King of Zhou Dynasty . One possibility is that Hu had been a junior officer of Jing Shu . If this assumption is acceptable , we can reinterpretation of the second paragraph of Hu Ding in -scription .

关 键 词：曶鼎铭 史律 畴官 史 卜 

分 类 号：D929.5[政治法律—法学]