检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄辉明[1]
出 处:《行政与法》2017年第11期83-88,共6页Administration and Law
摘 要:为了稳定房地产市场,我国各大城市广泛采取了住房限购政策。然而,限购政策与国家司法拍卖有关法律存在冲突,给房产司法拍卖执行活动带来了一定程度的冲击。笔者认为,房产司法拍卖是否适用限购政策不能"一刀切"。依据整体性法律观,要综合考虑有关法规、原则和政策,妥善加以解决。在有关法规与政府政策相冲突时,既要坚持保障民事权利的法律原则,也要兼顾维护公共利益的政策需要,在公共利益和当事人的民事权利之间取得适当平衡。In order to stabilize the real estate market,major cities in China are widely adopted a house purchase restric- tion policy.However,it is conflicted to national judicial auction law,and brings a certain degree of impact to judicial house auction activities.Whether judicial auction applying restriction policy or not,it cannot be solved a cut.On the basis of law as integrity,we should comprehensively consider the relevant regulations,principles and policies,and properly deal with it.We should not only adhere to the principle of protection of civil rights law,but also consider the policy needs to safeguard the interests of the public,and give attention to the fight balance between public interest and the civil rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68