检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Dr. Babatunde Adetunji Oni
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2017年第8期549-565,共17页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:The principles of restitution and reparation are proven international best practices in the globe; however, like every other legal principles, it has its imperfections and must be meticulously applied with prudence taking all factors into consideration; otherwise, they become counter-effective. This research paper seeks to expound the application of restitution and reparation to cases of funds which were carted away in different regimes by the corrupt Nigerians government officials. This research examines some cases of grand corruption in Nigeria which were enhanced by some foreign elements. Consequently, this paper analyses and argues that restitution and reparation as best international practices which would have enhanced Nigeria recover her stolen funds are being impeded by various policies put in place by some countries where the stolen funds are lying. That being the case, it becomes apposite to state that if these principles would get Nigeria anywhere, something has to be done with respect to the international impediments highlighted in this paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28