检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闵志刚[1,2] 张明[2] 牛晨[2] 徐龙[1] 谢文超[1]
机构地区:[1]宜兴市人民医院放射科,江苏宜兴214200 [2]西安交通大学第一附属医院影像中心,陕西西安710061
出 处:《实用放射学杂志》2017年第11期1665-1667,1674,共4页Journal of Practical Radiology
基 金:江苏大学医学临床科技发展基金项目(JLY20160029).
摘 要:目的 探索加入T2-信号强度(T2-SI)后扩散张量成像(DTI)在分辨肿瘤浸润和单纯瘤周水肿中的额外价值。方法 55例脑肿瘤(28例高级别胶质瘤、13例脑膜瘤和14例转移瘤)伴瘤周水肿的患者接受了DTI扫描。测量不同类型肿瘤瘤周水肿区的平均部分各向异性(FA)值、平均扩散率(MD)、纵向扩散率(λ∥)和轴向扩散率(λ⊥),并进行组间的比较。结果 组间比较显示仅高级别胶质瘤和脑膜瘤之间的平均FA值有显著差异(P〈0.05)。当将标准化的T2-SI作为协变量分析时,肿瘤组间的FA和λ⊥有显著差异。高级别胶质瘤水肿区校正的FA明显低于转移瘤(P〈0.05)和脑膜瘤(P〈0.001)。高级别胶质瘤水肿区的λ⊥明显高于脑膜瘤(P〈0.05)。结论 通过控制T2-SI的影响,DTI在区分肿瘤浸润和单纯水肿时可能有更大的价值。Objective To explore the added value of T2-signal intensity (T2-SI) in discriminating tumo-infiltration from pure vasogenic edema with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).Methods 55 patients with brain tumors [28 with high grade glioma (HGG), 13 with meningioma, and 14 with metastases] and concurrent peritumoral edema were scanned with DTI. The mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), longitudinal diffusivity (λ//) and radial diffusivity (λ⊥) in peritumoral edema of different tumors were measured and compared with each other.Results Only the mean FA showed significant difference between edema of HGG and meningioma (P〈0.05). When standardized T2-SI was used as the covariant, FA and λ⊥ showed significant differences among the tumor groups. The adjusted FA in edema of HGG was significantly lower than that of metastases (P〈0.05) and meningioma (P〈 0.001). The adjusted λ⊥ in edema of HGG was significantly higher than that of meningioma (P〈0.05).Conclusion By controlling the effect of T2-SI, the value of DTI in distinguishing tumor-infiltration from pure vasogenic edema could be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15