腹腔镜术与传统开腹术治疗子宫肌瘤患者的疗效对比观察  

Clinical efficacy comparison between laparoscopic and traditional open surgery in uterine fibroids

作　　者：巩苏[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省丰县人民医院妇产科,江苏徐州221700

出　　处：《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2016年第20期51-52,共2页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology

摘　　要：目的对腹腔镜术与传统开腹术治疗子宫肌瘤患者的疗效进行比较分析,以期提高子宫肌瘤临床治疗的水平。方法选取我院2015年1月~2016年1月收治的子宫肌瘤患者60例为研究对象,根据所有患者治疗方式的不同进行分组,其中给予传统开腹手术治疗的为对照组,给予腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除木治疗的为观察组,各30例。对两组患者手术情况及疗效进行分析比较。结果观察组术中出血量、肛门排气时间以及住院时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论腹腔镜木治疗子宫肌瘤相比传统开腹手术出血少、康复快,值得应用。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopy and traditional open surgery in the treatment of patients with uterine leiomyomata,and to improve the clinical treatment level.Methods In our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were 60 cases of uterine leiomyoma patients as the research object,according to the way of treatment in all the patients of different groups,which treated by traditional open surgery patients as control group,treated with laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of patients in the observation group,30 cases each.The patients in the two groups of operation and the effect analysis and comparison.The results of intraoperative bleeding of the observation group,anal exhaust time and hospitalization time were less than the control group,the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Results The amount of blood loss,anal exhaust time and and hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Laparoscopic myomectomy shows blood loss and fast recovery than traditional open surgery,so which is worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：开腹手术 腹腔镜术 子宫肌瘤 

分 类 号：R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]