检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院口腔牙体牙髓科,150001
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2017年第6期754-757,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目(编号:11551190)
摘 要:目的:比较化学固化氢氧化钙(Dycal)和光固化氢氧化钙(Calcimol LC)表面粘接处理后对其压缩强度的影响。方法:制备实验试件32个,分4组(n=8):A组为Dycal组;B组为Calcimol LC组;C组为粘接处理的Dycal组;D组为粘接处理的Calcimol LC组。采用德国Zwick电子万能试验机对各个试件进行压缩强度检测。结果:A、B、C、D组的平均压缩强度值分别为(110.48±19.9)、(162.6±7.8)、(136.8±17.2)和(223±31.1)MPa。D组压缩强度值高于其他3组(P<0.05),B组的压缩强度值高于A组(P<0.05),其他组间无明显统计学差异。结论:光固化氢氧化钙的压缩强度高于化学固化氢氧化钙,光固化氢氧化钙表面粘接处理后,提高了充填体的压缩强度,而化学固化氢氧化钙表面粘接处理对其压缩强度没有影响。Objective: To explore the effects of surface bonding on compressive strength of chemically-cured(Dycal) and light-cured ( Calcimol LC) calcium hydroxide. Methods: 32 experimental specimens were prepared and divided into 4 groups ( n = 8 ) : Group A, Dcyal without surface bonding; Group B, Calcimol LC without surface bonding; Group C, Dycal with surface bonding; Group D,Calcimol LC with surface bonding. German Zwick universal electronic testing machine was used to test the compressive strength of the specimens. Results : The average compressive strength value of group A, B, C and D was ( 110.48± 19.9), ( 162.6 ± 7.8), ( 136.8 ± 17. 2) and (223 ± 31.1 ) MPa respectively. Among them, the compressive strength of Group D was the highest ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compressive strength value of group B was higher than that of group A (P 〈 0.05 ). No statistical difference was detected between other groups. Con- clusion: The compressive strength of Light-cured Calcium Hydroxide is higher than that of chemically-cured Calcium Hydroxide. Surface bonding treatment can improve the compressive strength of Lightcured Calcium, no apparent effects can be produced on chemically- cured Calcium Hydroxide.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222