检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药物经济学》2017年第10期22-26,共5页China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
摘 要:目的对个体化方案、铋剂四联方案根除幽门螺杆菌感染进行药物经济学评价。方法基于1项随机、对照、双盲临床试验,构建决策树模型,比较个体化方案、铋剂四联方案与个体化补救方案的成本-效果和增量成本效果,并进行敏感性分析。结果个体化治疗组、铋剂四联组、个体化补救组成本-效果比(C/E)分别为989.96、299.24和515.85;个体化补救组相对于铋剂四联组的增量成本效果比为11 725.23。结论个体化方案作为一线方案不具有成本-效果,作为补救方案具有成本-效果。Objective To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of tailor therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication.Methods Based on a randomized,controlled,double-blind clinical trial,We constructed a decision tree model to analyze the cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness of tailor therapy,triple therapy plus bismuth therapy and tailor remedial therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication,and sensitivity analysis was carried out.Results The cost-effectiveness ratios of tailor therapy,triple therapy plus bismuth therapy and tailor remedial therapy were 989.96 yuan,299.24 yuan and 515.85 yuan.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of tailor remedial therapy relative to Triple therapy plus bismuth therapy was 11725.23 yuan.Conclusion The tailor therapy have cost-effectiveness as a remedy,but are not available as first-line treatment protocols.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28